Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haddox v. Meier

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 9, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00461Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION JAMES PARRISH HADDOX, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 1:23-CV-461-PPS-JEM DEBBIE MEIER, CHRIS NEWTON, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER James Parrish Haddox, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint raising claims about events which occurred in the Huntington County Jail. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API