Legal Opinion
Skiver v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2018No. 106560PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIM McCORMACK, P.J.:
{¶ 1} This case came to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 11.1. Plaintiff-appellant Samantha Skiver ("Skiver") appeals from the trial court's default judgment granted in her favor in the amount of $6,650. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On July 26, 2017, Skiver filed a complaint against defendant-appellees Marvin Wilson, Wilson's Tamales, Inc., and Feuerstein Properties, L.L.C. ("Appellees"), for unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, breach of contract, and replevin/conversion. Skiver alleged that Appellees verbally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckeye Supply Co. v. Northeast Drilling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Yin v. Amino Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Dye v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Farmers & Merchants State & Savings Bank v. Raymond G. Barr Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Maintenance Unlimited, Inc. v. SalemiOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brooks v. RKUK, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Smith v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Sailors v. PachecoOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- 5500 S. Marginal Way, L.L.C. v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Henderson v. SMC Prods., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.