Legal Opinion

United States v. Lindsey

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2009No. Criminal 08-034(RCL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is the defendant’s motion [18] to suppress tangible evidence. The defendant’s motion to suppress his statement was already granted during the motions hearing. Upon consideration of the motion, the supplement [22], the opposition [28], and the arguments and evidence introduced at the December 2, 2008 motions hearing, the defendant’s motion will be GRANTED and the evidence obtained by the government during the February 14, 2008 search will be suppressed.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Sometime in 2006, the Metropolitan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. United States v. SavoyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. United States v. ZemlyanskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. United States v. ScurryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API