Legal Opinion

Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1990No. 87-6690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion, 881 F.2d 602 (9th Cir.1989), is amended as follows:

The first full paragraph of the second column at 881 F.2d 603 (beginning with “This court has expressly recognized ... ”) is amended to read:

It is well-established that an allegation of a mere technical violation of state law, by itself, does not support a claim for federal habeas relief. See Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 121 n. 21, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 1568, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982); Wayne v. Raines, 690 F.2d 685, 687 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 914, 104 S.Ct. 275, 78 L.Ed.2d 256 (1983). This circuit has held, however,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Patrick Russell Wayne v. Robert R. RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Karl KellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API