Legal Opinion

Hawks v. Truesdell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1868PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Contract on a promissory note. At the second trial in the superior court, after the decision reported 12 Allen, 564, Brigham, J., directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff alleged exceptions. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.

At the first trial of this case in the superior court there were two special findings by the jury, favorable to the defendant, touching the consideration of the note in suit; but, under the instructions of the court, a general verdict was re*558turned for the plaintiff. The defendant took exceptions to these instructions, and his exceptions were sustained by this court. Upon a new trial in the superior court the defendant mc*ed that a formal verdict might be ordered by that court and-a judgment rendered thereon in his favor; claiming that, under the decision ■ of this court, the special findings…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Watts v. WattsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Hart v. BrierleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API