Legal Opinion
Hunter Douglas Corp. v. Lando Products, Inc. Lando Products, Inc. v. Hunter Douglas Corp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1954No. 13372_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Circuit Judge.
There are two appeals before us. Hunter Douglas Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Hunter, appeals from that portion of a judgment which decreed that the claims in patent No. 2,503,824 are not infringed by Lando Products, Inc., and that said claims are invalid. Lando Products, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Lando, appeals from a dismissal of its counterclaim.
The Patent Controversy
Letters patent were issued to Hunter as assignee of the inventors on April 11, 1950. The inventors perfected a process of trimming the edges of aluminum strips used in Venetian blinds so…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Kwikset Locks, Inc. v. Hillgren. Hillgren v. Kwikset Locks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Jacuzzi Bros. Inc. v. Berkeley Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Allied Equipment Company, Incorporated v. Weber Engineered Products, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Talon, Inc. v. Union Slide Fastener, Inc., Union Slide Fastener, Inc. v. Talon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Goldinger v. Boron Oil CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.