Legal Opinion

Walle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 2012No. 2D11-1393PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Jose Guadalupe Walle — thirteen years old when he committed numerous nonho-micide offenses in Hillsborough County— appeals his sentences, contending they violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Following convictions for eighteen offenses, the trial judge imposed sentences totaling sixty-five years of imprisonment. The trial judge also ordered the sixty-five-year terms to run consecutively to previously imposed concurrent sentences totaling twenty-seven years’ imprisonment. Three months earlier, a different trial judge in a different…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  3. Guzman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. State Of Washington v. Brian RonquilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API