Legal Opinion

Guzman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 2013No. 4D12-1354PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiklin, J.

Gerardo Guzman challenges his sixty-year sentence for violation of his probation. He claims that the sentence violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment in light of Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). Because we find that Graham strictly addressed actual life sentences — and not lengthy term-of-years sentences that might constitute a de facto sentence of life — we affirm Guzman’s sentence. We certify both conflict with the First District Court of Appeal and two questions to be of great public importance.

Guzman committed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Henry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Floyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Walle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Gerardo Guzman v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  5. Chauncey Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API