Legal Opinion
Luscombe v. Peterson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 47PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Montcalm; Davis, J. Bill by John B. Luscombe and others against Peter Peterson and another for the cancellation of a deed, and other relief. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
I am of the opinion that the learned circuit judge reached a proper conclusion in this cause. After Lyman W. Luscombe learned from Wilson, who drew the original papers, that they were no good, he went back to Wilson with the complainant, John B. Luscombe, for the purpose of correcting the error he had been told was made.
He testified:
“Q. Before you made the change you told your brother John, and you and John went to Wilson together, didn’t you?
*167“A. Yes; he said it was no good.
“Q. You fixed it up so it was good ?
“A. I supposed so.
“Q. Bo your brother would have it after you passed away while he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Dyer v. SkadanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Wilbur v. GroverMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Blackford v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barras v. BarrasMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Cook v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921