Legal Opinion

Cornell Harbison Excavating, Inc. v. May

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1988No. 10A04-8801-CV-22PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Cornell Harbison Excavating, Inc. (Harbison) appeals the trial court’s decision to strike its nonparty defense in this suit filed against it by Greg and Cherie May (Mays).

We affirm.

Harbison presents two issues for our review. Restated, they are:

1. whether, a party pleading the Indiana Comparative Fault Act’s nonparty defense must specifically name the nonparty, and

2. whether Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(F) is a proper method to challenge an improperly pled nonparty defense.

The Mays were driving their car when a dog ran onto the roadway…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Walters v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Alvers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Selchert v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Jacobs v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cornell Harbison Excavating, Inc. v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Rockrohr v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API