Legal Opinion

Di Francesco v. Di Francesco

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In an annulment action based upon the alleged invalidity of the foreign divorce decree theretofore obtained by defendant from his former wife for lack of jurisdiction, plaintiff seeks an examination before trial of the defendant, the defendant’s former wife and other persons with knowledge of material facts.

The fact that the examination before trial sought relates to an action for an annulment of a marriage is not in itself a bar to the examination (O’Connor v. O’Connor, 12 A D 2d 627). Am examination has been allowed where an essential element of the inquiry, as here, pertains to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Wiener v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Rolnick v. RolnickNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNulty v. McNultyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Garcia v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API