Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Piancone

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 30, 1974No. 74-1663PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The day has long passed when jurors were sent to deliberate upon their verdict and were “kept without meat, drink, fire or candle,” until they reached a verdict. 1 This case involves a related question in a more modern context, and that is whether jurors in a criminal case may be permitted to return to their homes overnight during the period of their deliberations. On the facts of this case, we hold that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he permitted the jury to disperse after their deliberations had begun.

Defendant was convicted of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. John L. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Bratcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. James J. D'AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Oscar W. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. United States v. Robert Almonte, United States of America v. Michael P. Ricapito, Joseph F. Corrigan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  5. State v. MagwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API