Legal Opinion
United States v. James E. Rhodenizer, Also Known as James E. Schelkle
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1997No. 96-2343PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
James E. Rhodenizer was convicted by a jury of possession of methamphetamine with an intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994), possession of marijuana with an intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and two counts of carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (1994). Rhodenizer appeals his conviction, asserting five arguments in support of his claim that his case should be reversed. We disagree and affirm the decision of the district court. 2
I
Acting on a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Keith M. FreisingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Enrique Flores, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Samuel Kenneth Willis, Also Known as Sharif Willis, United States of America v. Vincent Edward FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Kenneth Howard KoskelaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Daniel A. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James R. Nichols, United States of America v. Robert GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gerald MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Peter NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.