Legal Opinion

In re Fresh Dairy Products Antitrust Litigation (no. III)

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 2, 2016No. MDL No. 2715Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in an action (Winn-Dixie) pending in the Middle District of Florida move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize the four actions listed on the.attached Schedule A in the Southern District of Illinois. The other three actions are pending in the Southern District of Illinois, and have been consolidated for all purposes. Responding defendants oppose centralization,1 as do plaintiffs in the Illinois actions.

I

This antitrust litigation is before the Panel for the third time, albeit in a somewhat different form. In its first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Fresh Dairy Products Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  2. In re Plavix Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  3. In re Fresh Dairy Products Antitrust Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API