Legal Opinion

Collar v. Peninsular Gas Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 1956No. 45137PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Commissioner.

Louis H. Collar, plaintiff-appellant, instituted this action against the defendant-respondent, Peninsular Gas Company, seeking to recover $3,000 damages for the malicious prosecution of a civil action. The defendant appeared specially and filed its motion to quash the summons and the return of service thereon and to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction of the court thereof. Plaintiff has appealed from the action of the trial court in sustaining said motion to quash. We have jurisdiction since the appeal presents a constitutional question involving due process under…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Hall v. Wilder Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Ferrocarriles Nacionales De Mexico v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Hayman v. Southern Pacific CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Caloric Appliance CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Bertha Jennings v. McCall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. K-Mart Corp. v. HolligerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  5. Ponder v. Aamco Automatic Transmission, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API