Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Lippincott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On certiorari to the Court of Common Pleas of Atlantic county.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scudder, J.

An action of debt was brought in the court for the trial of small causes by Jacob M. Patterson against Barclay Lippincott, to recover the balance, $75, claimed under a contract in writing for the sale of the exclusive right to use, manufacture and sell the plaintiff’s patent “air-heáting attachment,” in Atlantic county, New Jersey. The writing was signed “ Geo. P. Lippincott, per Barclay Lippincott,” on the part of the purchaser. The state of demand avers that by virtue of this agreement the plaintiff did in due form convey said patent right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. . MadisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Mott v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  4. Whitney v. DutchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  5. Sutter v. Dutch ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Bregman Screen & Lumber Co. v. BechefskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Covault v. NevittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Goldfinger v. DohertyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Hammassapoulo v. HammassapouloSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API