Legal Opinion
United States v. Baucum
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 9, 1996No. 94-3040PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In his petition for rehearing, Patrick Bau-cum for the first time argues that his commerce clause challenge to the constitutionality of the “schoolyard statute”1 goes to the court’s subject matter jurisdiction and therefore cannot be deemed to have been waived by his failure to raise it in the trial court. On direct appeal we rejected his argument that the Supreme Court’s supervening decision in United States v. Lopez, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), made it necessary for this court to address the constitutional…
3Cases cited44 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Prou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Trevor Bjorkman, Paul Gunderson, Travis Fearing, Dennis Gunderson, and Joel HagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ran Choeum v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.