Legal Opinion

In Re infoUSA, Inc. Shareholders Litigation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 20, 2007No. Consol. Civil Action 1956-CCPublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHANDLER, Chancellor.

Before me is a complaint that tests the boundaries of the business judgment rule, the protection offered to defendant directors by Court of Chancery Rule 23.1, and the procedural rules by which a plaintiff brings a derivative complaint. After an activist shareholder petitioned this Court for access to books and records under 8 Del C. § 220, two plaintiffs brought separate lawsuits on behalf of in-foUSA against its directors. Both complaints alleged that the board either collaborated in or stood by idly in the face of a garish collection of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  2. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Noelle Lee v. Robert FisherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. In Re Intel Corp. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API