Legal Opinion

Doe v. Kurtis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 26, 1969No. 69 Civ. 4030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This action for declaratory and injunctive relief was commenced by plaintiff Jane Doe on behalf of herself, her minor dependent children and all others similarly situated, and seeks a judgment that New York Social Services Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 55, section 132-a, on its face and as applied, violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and conflicts with the relevant parts of the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. sections 601-610. Plaintiff now moves for a preliminary injunction and for an order convening a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Linehan v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberge v. PhilbrookDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1970
  2. Roe v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API