Legal Opinion

Roberge v. Philbrook

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 15, 1970No. Civ. A. 5805PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEDDY, Chief Judge.

The present action is brought by Therese Roberge and Carolyn Wells on behalf of their minor children and all others similarly situated against the Deputy Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare. The plaintiffs are all recipients of welfare assistance under the State Aid to Needy Families with Children (A.N.F.C.) Pro gram. The present A.N.F.C. plan in Vermont is challenged by the plaintiffs on two grounds:(1) The plan for A.N.F.C. distributions contains a standard of need calculation for recipients which does not reflect current necessities…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Santiago v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Francis v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  3. Tredwell A. Harrison and M. Gale Harrison v. William G. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. Tichon v. HarderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Osmond v. SpenceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API