Legal Opinion
People v. Cohen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1983PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*846In granting the defendant’s motion to suppress,* the County Court expressly found not only that the defendant’s consent to the initial entry did not extend to the ones the police effected on the following morning and thereafter, but that there was no basis in the evidence for the application of the emergency doctrine to justify re-entry. These findings have support in the record and, having been affirmed by the Appellate Division, are not subject to further review of this court (People v Fernandez, 58 NY2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. FuentesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. DonovonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. DesmaratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RiellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.