Legal Opinion

United States v. Brinda Defilippis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1981No. 80-1155PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Brinda DeFilippis was convicted on six counts of passing and uttering altered United States obligations with the intent to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. On appeal she contends that her conduct did not violate the statute, and that the jury instructions setting forth the elements of a section 472 violation were improper. She further contends that this court should re mand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether it was an element of her husband’s plea agreement that charges against her be dismissed. We affirm the conviction.

FACTS

Brinda DeFilippis and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Ruben R. Cortez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. Ruben Garza CoronadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rodis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Randy Lee EwainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Kenneth HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Theodore WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Johnson v. 2nd National Fund Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API