Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Marietta City Schools

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 18, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02935Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MELANIE LOCKHART, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:19-cv-2935 Magistrate Judge Jolson MARIETTA CITY SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter, in which the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Doc. 11), is before the Court on Defendants William Hampton’s and Marietta City School’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply (Doc. 67). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API