Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1996No. F-94-538 to F-94-541PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUMPKIN, Judge:

This case deals extensively with the Oklahoma Corrupt Organizations Prevention Act (hereinafter “Act”, “RICO”, or “racketeering charge”), codified at sections 1401 through 1419 of Title 22. It presents a first-impression question of venue which occurs when both predicate acts and substantive charges — some which occurred in other counties — are filed in one court proceeding.

I

Appellant Jackie Louis Carter was tried before a Cleveland County jury pursuant to the venue provisions of the Act and convicted as follows: in CF-93-410, he was convicted of Grand Larceny in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Martin John Beattie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Jim Walter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Vowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glenn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API