Legal Opinion

Carter v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 26, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 10809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChesnut, District Judge

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the above entitled case. The substantial question involved is whether the plaintiff is entitled to demand a jury trial.

Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., provides in part: “The right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution or as given by a statute of the United States shall be preserved to the parties inviolate. Any party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving on the other parties a demand therefor in writing at any time after the commencement of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Kathleen Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wyborski Ex Rel. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Bristol City Line of Steamships, Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API