Legal Opinion

Rowe v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 14, 1984No. Civ. No. 10391PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge.

This Title VII class action is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion for a finding of civil contempt. In an order entered September 22, 1982, this court found that Defendant had failed to comply with part of a consent decree entered herein on September 28, 1972 and directed immediate compliance. 550 F.Supp. 214 (N.D.Ga.1982). However, the court otherwise deferred ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion.

The relevant facts are set forth in the September 22, 1982 order and will not be repeated herein except briefly. Basically, the consent decree required that Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Jake ROWE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1437, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,310 in Re James A. Dinnan, Maija S. Blaubergs v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, James A. Dinnan, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Rowe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Rowe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Guardian Pools, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Rowe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
  3. Rowe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API