Legal Opinion

Ming Hin Chin v. Fletcher

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Ming Hin Chin was the owner in fee of a certain parcel of land, of the building situated thereon, *423and of a laundry which he operated therein. Chin* agreed to sell, and Chin Kong Sook agreed to buy, the premises and the business for $16,000, which sum Sook agreed to pay. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Sook paid Chin $4,000 on account. The balance of the cash purchase price was to be paid by Sook upon the transfer of title. The arrangements between Chin and Sook were basically oral, but a receipt in Chinese was given for the $4,000 paid on account and (in accordance with a local…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Sager v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Hanlon v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitler v. FriedebergNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Levins v. Troy Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API