Legal Opinion

Crane v. City of Janesville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAR from the Circuit-Court for Rode County. This action was brought against the City of Janesville and the treasurer thereof, to restrain the sale of lot 78 in Smith, Bailey & Stone’s addition to said city, for the taxes of 1854 ’55, ’56 and ’57, re-assessed in 1862 under ch. 48, Laws of 1862. The facts found by the circuit court are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

APPEAR from the Circuit-Court for Rode County. This action was brought against the City of Janesville and the treasurer thereof, to restrain the sale of lot 78 in Smith, Bailey & Stone’s addition to said city, for the taxes of 1854 ’55, ’56 and ’57, re-assessed in 1862 under ch. 48, Laws of 1862. The facts found by the circuit court are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Judgment for the plaintiffs; and defendants appealed. to the point that plaintiffs •were-estopped by their own neglect to have lot 78 assessed to them after the notice required by sec. 3, ch. 48, Pr. & L. Laws of 1862, had…

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The court below found as facts that the re-assessed taxon lot 78 for the year 1857 was not paid; that for that year *306tbe lot was assessed with lot 76, and a gross sum of about $130 was set opposite tbe two lots in tbe re-assessment; tbat they were botb assessed to A. Hyatt Smith, but be did not own lot 78 in 1857, and never owned it; and tbat tbe two lots bad always been owned by different persons. We do not understand tbat tbe correctness of tbis finding was seriously controverted; and we think it fully warrants tbe judgment rendered in tbe cause. In tbe case of The State ex rel. Roe v.…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vardeman v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Fifield v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Whittaker v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Title Trust Co. v. AylsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API