Mountain States Beet Growers Marketing Ass'n v. Wagner
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and we hereinafter so refer to them.
Defendant was organized under the Marketing Act (chapter 142, L. 1923). It had many members, of which plaintiff was one. With each it had a contract appointing it sole agent to market sugar beets. Such crops had to be sold before planted in order for the grower to procure seed and labor. The contract between association and grower was unlimited as to time but contained a provision that either party might cancel it by written notice given on or before November 1, of any year. Plaintiff brought suit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Keely v. Ophir Hill Consol. Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Nail v. McCullough & LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Lininger v. City of Sheridan Ex Rel. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Winbourn v. District Court Eighth DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Rio Arriba County Board of Education v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Elephant Butte Alfalfa Ass'n. v. RouaultNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.