State v. Bair
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Hon. W. D. Tisdale, Judge. Indictment for publicly professing to treat diseases while an itinerant vendor of drugs, nostrums, etc., without license. The district court sustained a demurrer to the indictment, and the state appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, C. J.
The indictment is as follows: “The grand jury of the county of Monroe, in the name and by the authority of the state of Iowa, accuse W. M. Bair of the crime of violating the pharmacy law, committed as follows: The said defendant, W. M. Bair, on the first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand, eight hundred and ninety-two, in Monroe county, being then and there an itinerant vendor of drugs, nostrums, ointments, and appliances intended for the treatment of diseases and injuries., did unlawfully and willfully, by printing, writing, and other methods, publicly profess to treat and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. TalericoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- In re AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Kirk v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.