Hi-Life Products, Inc. v. American National Water-Mattress Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BISSELL, Circuit Judge.
Hi-Life Products, Inc. (Hi-Life) appeals from that portion of a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California providing that “[n]one of [American National Water-Mattress Corp.'s (AM-NAT)] waterbeds infringe [sic] [Hi-Life’s United States Letters] Patent No. 4,411,033....” See Hi-Life Prods., Inc. v. American Nat’l Water-Mattress Corp., 2 USPQ2d 1886 (1987) (order granting AM-NAT’s partial summary judgment motion, entered March 31, 1987 [available on WESTLAW, 1987 WL 16879] and final judgment entered July 30, 1987). We vacate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Builders Concrete, Inc. v. Bremerton Concrete Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Duphar International Research B.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3Cited by32 opinions
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Micron Separations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- North American Vaccine, Inc. And National Research Council of Canada v. American Cyanamid Company and Praxis Biologics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Bert O. Jonsson, Besam Ab and Besam, Inc. v. The Stanley Works, the Stanley Works v. Besam, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- The Laitram Corporation v. Nec Corporation, Nec Information Systems, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.