Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
This action for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract arises out of defendant savings and loan associations’ refusal to consent to the plaintiff mortgagor’s sale of the mortgaged property without an increase in the interest rate. At issue is the extent to which a mortgagee’s agreement that “consent shall not be unreasonably withheld” limits the enforceability of a due-on-sale clause. Plaintiffs appeal from the order of the Kandiyohi County District Court for summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.
Appellant Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Viereck v. Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Quintana v. First Interstate BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- SHORTLAND v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Minnesota Central Railroad v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Rubin v. Centerbanc Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.