Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. Mawyer

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 2023No. 1:21-cv-02024Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL E. FUHRMAN, et al., : Plaintiffs : No. 1:21-cv-02024 : v. : (Judge Kane) : BRIAN A. MAWYER, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Before the Court is the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (Doc. No. 25) filed by Plaintiffs Michael E. Fuhrman and Linda M. Angel, Co-Executors of the Estate of their father, Eugene V. Fuhrman (“Plaintiffs”). Four motions to dismiss the TAC have been filed by Defendants Lindsay Goldberg, LLC and Goldberg, Lindsay & Co., LLC (“LG Defendants”), Defendant H.I.G. Capitol, LLC (“Defendant…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API