Grissom v. State

On Rehearing.

In support of his application for a rehearing counsel for the appellant urges four propositions for our consideration.

The first is that the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s objections to certain questions propounded on cross-examination to the witness Guy Grissom, a kinsman by marriage to the appellant, who had testified on direct examination that in his opinion the appellant was sane at the time of the commission of this offense. Pertaining to this proposition the record shows the following :

“Q. I will ask you as a matter of fact, if you heard rumors there in the…