Legal Opinion

Motley v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1922No. 3 Div. 570PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

For the purpose of showing that the testimony of a female witness who had testified for and favorably to the defendant was biased in his favor," it has been held proper to ask her on cross-examination if illicit relations had not existed between her and the defendant. Martin v. State, 125 Ala. 64, 2S South. 92.

In the instant case, for the purpose of showing that the prosecuting witness was unfriendly and biased against the defendant, it was proposed' to show, on the cross-examination of the witness, as well as on the direct examination of the defendant, that illicit relations had recently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Shepherd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Craven v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. State v. ElijahSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Baugh v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API