Covenant Mutual Insurance v. Able Concrete Pump
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
The sole issue left to be decided in this action is whether a surety for both payment and performance bonds on a government contract who completes performance for the defaulting contractor and also deposits the full amount of the payment bond with the court is entitled to sums retained by the government from the original contractor’s progress payments even though the payment bond does not fully compensate that contractor’s subcontractors. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff surety in this case is a subrogee of the government and has an equitable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Gray Road Fill, Inc. v. WrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1996