Maddox v. Heckler
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
POSTURE OF THE CASE
The Plaintiff has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Defendant Secretary that the Plaintiff is not entitled to a period of disability or disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The Secretary filed her Answer, accompanied by the certified transcript of the administrative record of the case upon which her decision was based, and both sides have fully briefed the case, which is thus submitted for decision on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Orville Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Butler O. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beavers v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Burkholder v. KijakaziDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Heller v. KijakaziDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Kevin Joe Byler v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Longer v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.