Legal Opinion

Heller v. Kijakazi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01104Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAYLEE LYNN HELLER, : Civil No. 1:23-CV-1104 : Plaintiff : : v. : : CAROLYN COLVIN,1 : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction In the instant Social Security appeal, the plaintiff invites us to undertake a daunting task. Heller urges us to find at Step 3 of the sequential analysis that governs Social Security appeals that she met all listing requirements and was, therefore, per se disabled. Heller argues that we should adopt this course…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API