Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hern v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1994No. 107-94Published

1ConcurrenceBaird, Judge

The majority correctly holds that appellant’s sentence was void because the punishment was not authorized by law. However, that fact alone does not defeat appellant’s jeopardy claim. In this case, the original sentence of twenty years was the result of a plea bargain agreement. When a sentence not authorized by law is derived through a plea bargain agreement, the proper remedy is to return the parties to their original positions. Heath v. State, 817 S.W.2d 335, 337 (Tex.Cr.App.1991) (citing Shannon v. State, 708 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Cr.App.1986)). Cf., Levy v. State, 818 S.W.2d 801, 803…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Hoang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Levy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Hern v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API