Legal Opinion

Lucien Lelong, Inc. v. H. Mohr & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatter, J.

This is an action for an injunction restraining the defendant from selling in this State perfume produced and sold by the plaintiff at prices less than those stipulated in so-called fair trade contracts between the plaintiff and retail distributors. The plaintiff asserts its right to the relief sought, under the Fair Trade Act (Laws of 1935, chap. 976 [McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws], §§ 2201-2205]). The usual allegations that the defendant had knowledge of the contracts and prices therein contained, and that in violation of them, the defendant has sold and offered for sale plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Mintz v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sears v. Western Thrift Stores of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Automotive Electric Service Corp. v. Times Square Stores Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. BraunNassau County District Court · 1972
  4. Carleton-Stuart Corp. v. Jamaica Gas & Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API