Legal Opinion
Doubleday v. Town of Stockbridge
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 5, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is an action of contract to recover sums paid over a period of years for taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed. Trial was by court and judgment was for the defendant.
The defendant pleaded nil debet, non assumpsit and the statute of limitations. At the trial the plaintiff seasonably moved that the defendant be required to eléct upon which of its defenses it proposed to rely. To the overruling of this motion the plaintiff excepted. The plaintiff’s brief calls attention to P. L. 1574, subd. II, and the construction placed upon it in Coates v. Eastern States Farmers Exchange, 99 Vt.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Brammall v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Town of Old Saybrook v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Town of Hartland v. Damon's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Grand Lodge of Vermont F. & A. M. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Glabach v. SardelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Robtoy v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. Estate of TaranovichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.