Legal Opinion

Green & Milam v. State Revenue Commission

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1939No. 12895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

With respect to the ruling in division 2 of the syllabus, Black on Income and Other Federal Taxes (3d ed.), §56, has this to say: “On general principles and irrespective of explicit constitutional limitations, a statute imposing an income tax may subject to taxation the income of the citizen for the whole of the current year in which the statute is passed, that is, not only so much of the income as accrued from the date of the enactment of the law to the end of the year, but also that portion which accrued or was earned from the beginning of the year to the date of the law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Carroll v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Norman v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Page v. SansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. State Revenue Commission v. LazearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlanta Independent School System v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Herndon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Forrester v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Fidelity Columbia T. Co. v. Com'r of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  5. Roberts v. GunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API