Legal Opinion
Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De Lavaud
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 7, 1919No. 372PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Bill by the Sandusky Foundry & Machine Company against D. Seusaud De Eavaud and others. Decree for defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
The bill in this case is in the usual form, charging infringement by defendents of certain patents, and praying an injunction. The defenses are the usual ones of invalidity for lack of novelty and lack of invention .and noninfringement. *641Complainant’s bill is based on United States letters patent No. 1,058,-250, issued April 8, 1913, to William Ii. Millspaugh, and No. 1,047-972, issued December 24, 1912, to William H. Millspaugh, and by him assigned to the complainant. Claims 1, 2, and 4 of the first, and claim 1 of the last, mentioned patents only are in issue.
[1,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams Electric Ry. Co. v. Lindell Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. v. Cleveland Chain & Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benjamin v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925