James v. Board of Commissioners Greene & Craighead Counties Drainage District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is first contended that the decree should be reversed because the cashiers of the two banks signed the claims which were presented to the commissioners and swore that nothing had been paid towards the satisfaction thereof. It will be remembered that each claim recites that it was a note given to the bank by the commissioners of the drainage district. As we have already seen, the original act creating the district provides that, if the work of improvement is not performed, the preliminary expenses shall be paid by a levy of taxes upon the real property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gould v. TolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Gould v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Southern Crawford Road Improvement District v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jasper v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Bank of Shirley v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Wasson, Bank Commissioner v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936