A. E. P. Industries, Inc. v. McClure
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*156WHICHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends it is entitled to a preliminary injunction as a matter of law. We disagree.
A preliminary injunction may be issued by order . . .:(1) When it appears by the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and this relief, or any part thereof, consists in restraining the commission or continuance of some act the commission or continuance of which, during the litigation, would produce injury to the plaintiff. . . .
G.S. 1-485 (Cum. Supp. 1981). The injury threatened to plaintiff must be irreparable, real and immediate. Telephone Co. v. Plastics,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Pharr v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- United Telephone Co. of Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Forrest Paschal MacHinery Co. v. MilholenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- City of Durham v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. Pinewood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- A. E. P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Global Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Harris v. Pinewood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Price v. CarlsonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018