Legal Opinion

Bloomer v. Cheney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 19, 1973No. 140-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, State Senator from Rutland County, asserts that the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Conservation has violated the express provisions of the so-called “bottle ban” legislation, 10 V.S.A. § 1523, by the regulations he promulgated to put such legislation into effect. The regulations dealt with the transition from no-deposit to the now mandatory returnable bottles. Although the statute provided that after July 1, 1973, only the returnable bottle and deposit system would be in effect, the regulations deferred the full restraint of the statute for sixty days to allow…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  3. Gould v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
  4. Lace v. University of Vermont & State Agricultural CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Rutland Cable T. v. Inc. v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Ley v. DallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Office of the Auditor of Accounts v. Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  4. Dowlings, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. Okemo Trailside Condominiums, Inc. v. BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API