Legal Opinion
In Re Tyco International, Ltd., Securities Litigation
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 22, 2002No. 1:00-md-01335PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARBADORO, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs in this securities fraud class action contend that, from October 1, 1998 through December 8,1999 (“the Class Period”), defendant Tyco International Ltd., acting under the control, at the behest, or with the knowledge of individually named defendants Michael A. Ashcroft, Mark A. Belnick, L. Dennis Kozlowski, Robert P. Mead, and Mark H. Swartz, artificially inflated the price of Tyco’s stock by misleadingly promoting Tyco as a “turn-around” specialist able to acquire and then wring profits from underperform-ing companies. In their second…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Novak v. KasaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Beddall v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Tyco Intern., Ltd. Multidistrict LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- In Re Dynegy, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- In Re Daimlerchrysler Ag Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- In Re Suprema Specialities, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Hromyak v. Tyco Intern. Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.