Legal Opinion

Tribble v. Hentz

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 0480PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The issue involved in this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in permitting an expert witness to testify when counsel for the opposing parties learned the day before the trial that the witness would be called as an expert. We are not convinced from the record that the court, in allowing the expert witness to testify, committed an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law. We therefore affirm.

On September 17, 1982, approximately three months after this action was commenced, counsel for the appellants Fannie and Augustus Tribble served interrogatories…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Laney Ex Rel. Estate of Laney v. HefleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. Jackson v. H. & S. Oil Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlyle Ex Rel. Estate of Carlyle v. Tuomey HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Jenkins v. FewCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API