Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Koons
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 22, 1991No. 89 Civ. 6707 (CSH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Following entry of this Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated December 10, 1990, 751 F.Supp. 474 familiarity with which is assumed, plaintiff made a timely motion for reargument pursuant to Civil Rule 3(j) of this Court. 1 Upon consideration, the motion for reargument is granted, and judgment for infringement will enter against defendant Sonnabend Gallery, Inc.
I am not at all certain that Sonnabend is vicariously liable for Koon’s infringement under Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir.1963), the case…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., and Third Party Jalen Amusement Company, Inc., and Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Barry Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Rogers v. KoonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faulkner v. National Geographic SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- King Records, Inc. v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Stockart.Com, LLC v. Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006