Hagrove v. Arnold Construction Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is certiorari to the department of labor and industry, to review an order made by them. The facts in the case are not in dispute. Testimony shows that the plaintiff, on January 17, 1924, was employed by the defendant Arnold Construction Company as a brick mason tender. He had been so employed about a week prior to the latter date. On January 17, 1924, the plaintiff began work at 8 o’clock in the morning and quit at 4:80 in the afternoon, working the usual 8-hour day. He was engaged in serving brick and tending masons on a scaffold. There were 21 masons and laborers working on the job at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Landers v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Savage v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Byrd v. Stonega Coke & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Doyle v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Keller v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wright v. KeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932